IQTISODIY O‘SISH VA EKOLOGIK BARQARORLIKNI TA’MINLASHDA YASHIL FISKAL SIYOSATNI RIVOJLANTIRISHNING XORIJ TAJRIBASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21538361Keywords:
yashil fiskal siyosat, uglerod soligʻi, ekologik soliqlar, emissiyalar savdosi tizimi, dekupling (ajralish), poligon soligʻi.Abstract
Mazkur maqolada iqtisodiy oʻsish va ekologik barqarorlikni taʼminlashda yashil fiskal
siyosatni rivojlantirishning xalqaro tajribasi tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqotda davlatlar iqtisodiy rivojlanish
darajasiga koʻra rivojlangan (Shvetsiya, Daniya, Finlyandiya, AQSH) va rivojlanayotgan (Qozogʻiston)
guruhlarga ajratilib, ularning uglerod soligʻi, emissiyalar savdosi tizimi, transport, plastik paket va
poligon soliqlari borasidagi tajribasi qiyoslangan. Tahlil natijalariga koʻra, yashil fiskal instrumentlarning
samaradorligi ularning turiga emas, balki soliq daromadlarini qayta yoʻnaltirish dizayni, institutsional
tayyorgarlik va isteʼmolchiga toʻgʻridan-toʻgʻri fiskal signal yetkazilishiga bogʻliq ekanligi aniqlandi. Maqola
natijalari Oʻzbekistonda yashil fiskal siyosat mexanizmlarini takomillashtirish boʻyicha amaliy tavsiyalar
ishlab chiqishga xizmat qiladi.
References
1. Andersson J. J. Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study // American Economic Journal:
Economic Policy. – 2019. – Vol. 11. – P. 1–30.
2. Carl J., Fedor D. Tracking global carbon revenues: A survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the
real world // Energy Policy. – 2016. – Vol. 96. – P. 50–77.
3. Meireles M., Robaina M., Magueta D. The effectiveness of environmental taxes in reducing CO2 emissions
in passenger vehicles: The case of Mediterranean countries // International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health. – 2021. – Vol. 18. – No. 10. – P. 5442.
4. Transport & Environment (T&E). CO2 Emissions from Cars: The Facts. – Brussels: European Federation
for Transport and Environment, 2018.
5. Gass V., Schmidt J., Schmid E. Analysis of alternative policy instruments to promote electric vehicles in
Austria // Renewable Energy. – 2014. – Vol. 61. – P. 96–101.
6. Kok R. Six years of CO2-based tax incentives for new passenger cars in The Netherlands: Impacts on
purchasing behavior trends and CO2 effectiveness // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.
– 2015. – Vol. 77. – P. 137–153.
7. Bansal P., Dua R. Fuel consumption elasticities, rebound effect and feebate effectiveness in the Indian
and Chinese new car markets // Energy Economics. – 2022. – Vol. 113. – P. 106192.
8. Karplus V. J. et al. Should a vehicle fuel economy standard be combined with an economy-wide
greenhouse gas emissions constraint? Implications for energy and climate policy in the United States //
Energy Economics. – 2013. – Vol. 36. – P. 322–333.
9. Convery F., McDonnell S., Ferreira S. The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags
levy // Environmental and Resource Economics. – 2007. – Vol. 38. – P. 1–11.
10. Dikgang J., Leiman A., Visser M. Elasticity of demand, price and time: Lessons from South Africa’s plastic
bag levy // Applied Economics. – 2012. – Vol. 44. – No. 26. – P. 3339–3342.
11. Matheson T. Disposal is Not Free: Fiscal Instruments to Internalize the Environmental Costs of Solid
Waste. – IMF Working Paper WP/19/283, 2019.
12. Jofre-Monseny J., Sorribas-Navarro P. Landfill tax and recycling // Fiscal Studies. – 2024. – Vol. 45. – P.
483–500.
13. Martin A., Scott I. The Effectiveness of the UK Landfill Tax // Journal of Environmental Planning and
Management. – 2003. – Vol. 46. – No. 5. – P. 673–689.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 GREEN ECONOMY AND DEVELOPMENT
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.