GLOBAL BRANDING VS. LOCAL BRANDING: STRATEGIC TRADE-OFFS IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETING

GLOBAL BRANDING VS. LOCAL BRANDING: STRATEGIC TRADE-OFFS IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETING

Авторы

  • Aziz Abdullaev
  • Kamila Mamasolieva
  • Zaynabkhon Akhmedova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19997541

Ключевые слова:

global branding, local branding, international marketing, consumer behavior, market share, hybrid strategy, competitiveness

Аннотация

This article examines the strategic differences between global branding and local branding in
international marketing, including their advantages and limitations. Using the cases of Nike, Apple, Anta Sports, and
Xiaomi, the study analyzes the impact of branding strategies on market share, revenue growth, consumer loyalty,
and competitiveness. The findings show that global brands benefit from international recognition, consistent image,
and premium positioning opportunities. Local brands gain advantages through cultural adaptation, flexible pricing,
and closer consumer relationships. The study concludes that a hybrid strategy combining global identity with local
responsiveness is the most effective approach for sustainable success in international markets.

Биографии авторов

Aziz Abdullaev

Acting Associate Professor
Department of International Finance and Investment
University of World Economy and Diplomacy


Kamila Mamasolieva

University of World Economy and Diplomacy, Faculty of MEM
Major: Foreign Economic Activity
Phone: +998 97 422 09 55

Zaynabkhon Akhmedova

University of World Economy and Diplomacy, Faculty of MEM
Major: Foreign Economic Activity
Phone: +998 97 111 40 27

Библиографические ссылки

1. Nike (2024) Form 10-K Annual Report 2024. Available at: NIKE, Inc. Investor Relations – News, Events and

Reports.

2. Apple (2024) Form 10-K Annual Report 2024. Available at: archive.org.

3. Anta Sports (2023) Annual Report 2023. Available at: ir.anta.com/en/financial_report_share.php

4. Xiaomi (2024) Annual Report 2024. Available at: ir.mi.com/financial-information/annual-interim-reports

5. Theodore Levitt (1983) ‘The Globalization of Markets’, Harvard Business Review.

6. Susan P. Douglas and C. Samuel Craig (2011) ‘Convergence and Divergence: Developing a Global Marketing

Strategy’, Journal of International Marketing, 19(1), pp. 82–101.

7. Isabelle Schuiling and Jean-Noël Kapferer (2004) ‘Real Differences Between Local and International Brands’,

Journal of International Marketing, 12(4), pp. 97–112.

8. Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp, Rajeev Batra and Dana L. Alden (2003) ‘How Perceived Brand Globalness

Creates Brand Value’, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(1), pp. 53–65.

9. Aysegul Özsomer (2012) ‘The Interplay Between Global and Local Brands’, Journal of International Marketing,

20(2), pp. 72–95.

10. Ilan Alon, Eugene Jaffe, Carsten Prange and Donata Vianelli (2017) Global Marketing: Contemporary Theory,

Practice, and Cases. 2nd edn. Routledge.

11. Aziz Kurbanovich Abdullaev (2025) International Marketing: A Manual. University of World Economy and

Diplomacy, Tashkent. 136 p.

12. International Data Corporation (2025) Worldwide Smartphone Market Share.

13. Deloitte (2023) Global Marketing Trends.

14. Deloitte (2023) Global Marketing Trends

Загрузки

Опубликован

2026-04-01

Как цитировать

Abdullaev, A., Mamasolieva , K., & Akhmedova , Z. (2026). GLOBAL BRANDING VS. LOCAL BRANDING: STRATEGIC TRADE-OFFS IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETING. ЗЕЛЁНАЯ ЭКОНОМИКА И РАЗВИТИЕ, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19997541
Loading...